<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>This is great...how about number 7 on the list </title>
        <link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/topic/33215/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Eat Your Heart Out UM ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:48:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241746/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241746</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Spin it any way you want.  My eyes saw Ole Miss losing 31-7 to Auburn and 16-3 for the majority of the SC game until Snead decided to throw one to his own team
toward the end. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Hanmudog)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241746</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:48:52 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241741/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241741</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ How they say &quot;the Rebels have same conference record as usual cellar-dweller Mississippi State.&quot; Yes, I know we are a usual cellar-dweller, but
people act like because OM had one good season that they havn&#39;t been and still aren&#39;t a &quot;usual cellar-dweller.&quot;  F*cking faggots. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (BCash)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241741</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:45:57 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241743/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241743</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Hanmudog wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  When you are picked to be a top 10 team and your biggest win this year is over a 4-4 Arkansas team then you are officially a disappointment. Also in Ole
  Miss&#39; 3 losses, yall have been outscored 71-33.  It is not like there have been near misses.
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
We were dominated in one game, the Bama game. That&#39;s the only game where I knew we didn&#39;t have a chance the entire game. We played sloppy and still had
a chance to beat SC, only outgained by 40 yards, and finished about 30 yards shy of the win. We played sloppy again and got beat by Auburn, being outgained by
only 7 yards. They jumped out to a big lead, but that game wasn&#39;t put away until the final minutes of the 4th quarter.
<br>
<br>
That&#39;s not the point though. Yes, we&#39;ve had a disappointing year so far, but that list is going to change dramatically over the final month. Some of
those teams will bomb out, and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (RebelBruiser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241743</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:45:52 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241703/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241703</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ When you are picked to be a top 10 team and your biggest win this year is over a 4-4 Arkansas team then you are officially a disappointment. Also in Ole
Miss&#39; 3 losses, yall have been outscored 71-33.  It is not like there have been near misses. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Hanmudog)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241703</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:20:30 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241702/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241702</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ole Miss is the the first team that is not ranked on the list.  Combine that with the fact that they were voted as high as #4 without playing any competition. 
I would have them as #1 most disappointing team in the nation. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Dental Dawg)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241702</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:19:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241699/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241699</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I wouldn&#39;t say they&#39;re a disappointment this season at all.  Go Domers! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (JohnDawg)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241699</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:14:48 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241697/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241697</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Depends on how you would rank it. You could have us higher. All that said, I think it&#39;s a little early to be doing a ranking of most disappointing teams.
Some of the teams on that list will finish strong and some will bomb out. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (RebelBruiser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241697</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:10:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241696/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241696</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ From #4 to fighting for six wins?  That should def. be #1.  And where are the Irish?  And VT at #2?  Everybody knows VT is never really that good.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (bulldogbaja)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241696</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:09:08 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241691/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241691</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">RebelBruiser wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Here is your pre-season AP Top 20 and their current AP status with ranking:
  <br>
  <br>
  1. Florida - (1) 8-0
  <br>
  2. Texas - (2) 8-0
  <br>
  <strong>3. Oklahoma - (20) 5-3
  <br>
  4. USC - (12) 6-2
  <br></strong> 5. Alabama - (3) 8-0
  <br>
  <strong>6. Ohio State - (15) 7-2</strong>
  <br>
  <strong>7. Virginia Tech - (22) 5-3
  <br></strong> 8. Penn State - (11) 8-1
  <br>
  9. LSU - (9) 7-1
  <br>
  <strong>10. Ole Miss - (NR) 5-3
  <br></strong> 11. Oklahoma State - (18) 6-2
  <br>
  12. California - (23) 6-2
  <br>
  <strong>13. Georgia - (NR) 4-4
  <br></strong> 14. Oregon - (7) 7-1
  <br>
  15. Georgia Tech - (10) 8-1
  <br>
  16. Boise State - (5) 8-0
  <br>
  17. TCU - (6) 8-0
  <br>
  18. Utah - (17) 7-1
  <br>
  <strong>19. Florida St. - (NR) 4-4</strong>
  <br>
  20. North Carolina - (NR) 5-3
  <br>
  <br>
  Just to give you a little perspective on the other teams out there.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Maroon Eagle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241691</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:04:56 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241689/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241689</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Here is your pre-season AP Top 20 and their current AP status with ranking:
<br>
<br>
1. Florida - (1) 8-0
<br>
2. Texas - (2) 8-0
<br>
3. Oklahoma - (20) 5-3
<br>
4. USC - (12) 6-2
<br>
5. Alabama - (3) 8-0
<br>
6. Ohio State - (15) 7-2
<br>
7. Virginia Tech - (22) 5-3
<br>
8. Penn State - (11) 8-1
<br>
9. LSU - (9) 7-1
<br>
10. Ole Miss - (NR) 5-3
<br>
11. Oklahoma State - (18) 6-2
<br>
12. California - (23) 6-2
<br>
13. Georgia - (NR) 4-4
<br>
14. Oregon - (7) 7-1
<br>
15. Georgia Tech - (10) 8-1
<br>
16. Boise State - (5) 8-0
<br>
17. TCU - (6) 8-0
<br>
18. Utah - (17) 7-1
<br>
19. Florida St. - (NR) 4-4
<br>
20. North Carolina - (NR) 5-3
<br>
<br>
Just to give you a little perspective on the other teams out there. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (RebelBruiser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241689</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:00:20 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241687/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241687</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Even your overhyped program&#39;s precipitous fall from grace is treated as &quot;mediocre,&quot; even expected.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Shmuley)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241687</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:54:53 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241682/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>They pick the same 15 teams year in and year out and they get the same results.  When will those idiots learn?   In  the case of Ole Miss the only people
who are disapointed are Rebel fans who really believed the hype and the idiots who ranked them so high.  Even in the coaches poll they were ranked high.  That
just goes to show that majority of them are idiots as well or they let some mid level PR person do their voting for them and that PR person doesn&#39;t have a
clue and goes along with what ever everyone else is doing.</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Big D)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241682</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:51:27 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241681/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241681</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think they should be number 3. but then again, they weren&#39;t as good as everyone thought they were (obviously). Well all knew it and anyone who is an SEC
fan knows that Nutt is notorious for this kind of shit. See Arkansas.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Dawg725)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241681</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:51:08 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/241669/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html#reply-241669</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ALL the hype, preseason top 10, moving up to 4th in the nation, the Need for Snead, then they fall on their faces.  I think the only teams that should be above
them are Oklahoma and USC based on their reputations alone; however, Oklahoma lost their Heisman QB for the season and USC starts a true freshmens QB. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (JohnDawg)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/241669</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:38:20 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ This is great...how about number 7 on the list  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/topic/33215/t/This-is-great-how-about-number-7-on-the-list.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <a target="_blank" href="http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/pgStory?contentId=10313322#sport=COLLEGE%20FOOTBALL&amp;photo=10313616">Eat Your Heart Out UM</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Dawg725)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/topic/33215</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:19:35 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>