<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Soccer Bracketology - way too early wild guesses </title>
        <link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/topic/34385/t/Soccer-Bracketology-way-too-early-wild-guesses.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ South Africa

Greece

N. Korea

United States


Brazil

Slovenia

S. Korea

Cameroon


Spain

Serbia

Australia

Nigeria


Netherlands

Switzerland

Paraguay

Mexico


Italy

Portugal

Uruguay

Cote d&#39;Ivoire


Germany

Denmark

New Zealand

Honduras


Argentina

France

Japan

Algeria


England

Slovakia

Chile

Ghana


I figure the seeded teams will be the teams listed first in each group, then the unseeded Europeans will be sorted out, followed by a combination of Asia/South
America/New... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:10:03 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:48:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Soccer Bracketology - way too early wild guesses  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/250055/t/Soccer-Bracketology-way-too-early-wild-guesses.html#reply-250055</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ok, I did some quick Math using the <a title="2006 " target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_FIFA_World_Cup_seeding">2006</a> formula:
<br>
<br>
Here&#39;s how it stands: According to FIFA calculations, 1st place gets 32 pts...2nd place, 31 pts and so on
<br>
<br>
                      Standing (Pts)
<br>
                        Dutch/French
<br>
<br>
02 WC (33.3%): 0(0)/28(8) (Looks like FIFA awards 8 points to all the last place finishers in the group stage of WC)
<br>
06 WC (66.7%): 9(24)/2(31) (the Dutch lost in the 2nd round and I placed them 9th based on their finish in Group game points table)
<br>
<br>
Total WC pts: 16 (Dutch)/23.33 (French)
<br>
<br>
Nov 09 Rankings (33.3%): 3(30)/9(24)
<br>
Dec 08 Rankings (33.3%): 4(29)/12(21)
<br>
Dec 07 Rankings (33.3%): 9(24)/7(26)
<br>
<br>
Total Ranking pts: 27.67 (Dutch)/ 23.67 (French)
<br>
<br>
OVERALL Points: 43.67 (Dutch)/ 47 (French)
<br>
<br>
I&#39;m surprised at how close the point difference is. Of course,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (msubullie4life)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/250055</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:47:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Soccer Bracketology - way too early wild guesses  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/250040/t/Soccer-Bracketology-way-too-early-wild-guesses.html#reply-250040</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That being said, if the USA, Mexico, and Honduras are indeed grouped with Africa the US has a one-third chance of being drawn in South Africa&#39;s group
because I don&#39;t expect FIFA to group two African teams together, and the way the qualification looks so far-- I would not be surprised if Concacaf and
Africa are grouped together.
<br>
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Maroon Eagle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/250040</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:12:42 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Soccer Bracketology - way too early wild guesses  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/250035/t/Soccer-Bracketology-way-too-early-wild-guesses.html#reply-250035</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ France is #9, and I think it&#39;ll be between those two countries for the last seeded spot.  I&#39;m also kind of thinking the French might be unseeded
because of Henry&#39;s handball earlier this afternoon.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Maroon Eagle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/250035</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:03:33 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Soccer Bracketology - way too early wild guesses  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/250032/t/Soccer-Bracketology-way-too-early-wild-guesses.html#reply-250032</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think the top 8 seeds are going to be:
<br>
<br>
Brazil
<br>
Spain
<br>
Germany
<br>
Italy
<br>
Argentina
<br>
England
<br>
France
<br>
South Africa  (host)
<br>
<br>
Netherlands will miss out on being one of the 8 seeds. While determining the seedings, FIFA gives a lot of weightage to previous 2 or 3 WCs (in <a title="2006" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_FIFA_World_Cup_seeding">2006</a> it was the last 2 WCs..in <a title="2002 " target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_FIFA_World_Cup_seeding"></a><a title="2002 " href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_FIFA_World_Cup_seeding">2002</a> and <a title="1998" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_FIFA_World_Cup_seeding">1998</a>, it was the previous 3 WCs...This years seeding system has not been announced yet). Of
course, they take into account the world rankings in the past 3 years too. Seeing that the French were finalists last year and Holland missed the 2002 WC, it
is... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (msubullie4life)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/250032</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:42:52 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Soccer Bracketology - way too early wild guesses  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/250028/t/Soccer-Bracketology-way-too-early-wild-guesses.html#reply-250028</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ we get put in a group that easy.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (MSUCostanza)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/250028</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:34:02 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Soccer Bracketology - way too early wild guesses  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/250021/t/Soccer-Bracketology-way-too-early-wild-guesses.html#reply-250021</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I know it is just a guess, but that would be an excellent draw.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (UpTheMiddlex3Punt)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/250021</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:12:20 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Soccer Bracketology - way too early wild guesses  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/topic/34385/t/Soccer-Bracketology-way-too-early-wild-guesses.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>South Africa
<br>
Greece
<br>
N. Korea
<br>
United States
<br>
<br>
Brazil
<br>
Slovenia
<br>
S. Korea
<br>
Cameroon
<br>
<br>
Spain
<br>
Serbia
<br>
Australia
<br>
Nigeria
<br>
<br>
Netherlands
<br>
Switzerland
<br>
Paraguay
<br>
Mexico
<br>
<br>
Italy
<br>
Portugal
<br>
Uruguay
<br>
Cote d&#39;Ivoire
<br>
<br>
Germany
<br>
Denmark
<br>
New Zealand
<br>
Honduras
<br>
<br>
Argentina
<br>
France
<br>
Japan
<br>
Algeria
<br>
<br>
England
<br>
Slovakia
<br>
Chile
<br>
Ghana
<br>
<br>
I figure the seeded teams will be the teams listed first in each group, then the unseeded Europeans will be sorted out, followed by a combination of Asia/South
America/New Zealand, finished off by Africa and Concacaf.
<br>
<br>
If Costa Rica somehow defeats Uruguay, I think the sorting would be changed to:  Seeded teams, UEFA, Asia and Concacaf, and then Africa, South America, and New
Zealand. 
<br>
<br>
BTW, I didn&#39;t know that FIFA employed SEC football referees.   The Irish were gypped.</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Maroon Eagle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/topic/34385</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:10:03 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>