<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC </title>
        <link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/topic/8147/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ While I believe there is enough quality teams to make it a debate- I just don&#39;t see it, however-


&quot;Calling roll, we find that Chase Daniel (Missouri), Sam Bradford (Oklahoma), Todd Reesing (Kansas), Colt McCoy (Texas) and Graham Harrell (Texas Tech)
are among the top pitch men in the nation.&quot;


Not bad.


Oklahoma, Kansas, Kansas State, Texas, Texas A&amp;M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, Nebraska, Iowa State, Baylor, Missouri and Colorado- Not a whole lot of
cupcakes in there.... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:31:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/59024/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-59024</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fox Sports is stupid... I&#39;m a Big XII guy, and I know the SEC is WAY better, especially this year...
<br>
<br>
Mizzou will be OK, about like they were last year, not really able to beat an elite team... KU will be OK, but only about 7 wins... Texas might actually finish
third in the South behind Tech and OU...
<br>
<br>
The only thing that will save the Big XII in any argument is how good OU, Tech and Mizzou will be... otherwise, the SEC gets the edge... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (GuyBehindtheGuy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/59024</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:31:14 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/59011/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-59011</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ While I think Missouri will be decent this year, kansas actually has to play TX and OK this year, and I don&#39;t think they&#39;ll be nearly as good. I say
7-5ish... But there&#39;s no way they&#39;re up with the SEC ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (dawgatUSM)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/59011</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:27:28 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58958/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58958</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>nm</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Hector)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58958</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:20:43 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58954/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58954</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Hector wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">RebelBruiser wrote:</strong>
    <br>
    <hr>

    <br>
    I like how he lists all 12 teams and then states that the list doesn&#39;t include many cupcakes. 
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
      
  </blockquote>   The reason I listed the teams is so everyone could see them without having to think about it and compare conferences.  Here&#39;s an example
  using players names:
  <br>
  <br>
  Tim Tebow
  <br>
  Percy Harvin
  <br>
  Micheal Orhe
  <br>
  Antoine Caldwell
  <br>
  Derrick Pegues
  <br>
  Morshawn Moreno
  <br>
  <br>
  Get it.
  <br>
  <br>
  By the way, the SEC is still the best conference but top to bottom the Big 12 isn&#39;t bad- that&#39;s all I was saying.
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I agree. The Big 12 and the Pac-10 are the only other conferences in the country that even have an argument for possibly being the best.
<br>
<br>
I was just... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (RebelBruiser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58954</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:13:25 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58952/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58952</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">RebelBruiser wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I like how he lists all 12 teams and then states that the list doesn&#39;t include many cupcakes. 
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
    
</blockquote>   The reason I listed the teams is so everyone could see them without having to think about it and compare conferences.  Here&#39;s an example
using players names:
<br>
<br>
Tim Tebow
<br>
Percy Harvin
<br>
Micheal Orhe
<br>
Antoine Caldwell
<br>
Derrick Pegues
<br>
Morshawn Moreno
<br>
<br>
Get it.
<br>
<br>
By the way, the SEC is still the best conference but top to bottom the Big 12 isn&#39;t bad- that&#39;s all I was saying.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Hector)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58952</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:08:24 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58951/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58951</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ plus, you don&#39;t even want to know what I made on the ACT.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (jakldawg)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58951</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:07:21 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58948/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58948</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I like how he lists all 12 teams and then states that the list doesn&#39;t include many cupcakes.
<br>
<br>
That&#39;s similar to listing off the depth chart for a team and saying they have tons of depth using only player&#39;s names as your argument.
<br>
<br>
However, I do think that the Pac-10 and the Big 12 are the only two conferences in the country that can make an argument that they are in the same league with
the SEC top to bottom. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (RebelBruiser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58948</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:47:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58945/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58945</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <strong>i&#39;ve always thought fox sports was big 12 heavy</strong>
<br>
<br>
<br>
But, But ........... Fox is fair and balanced......... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (AROB44)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58945</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:36:30 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58940/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58940</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think that only Texas and Oklahoma would compete for an SEC title should they hypothetically switch leagues. I think that Florida, Georgia, Auburn, Tenn and
LSU could all win a Big - 12 championship this year. Tenn being the only long shot. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (bonedaddy401)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58940</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:17:37 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58938/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58938</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ nm ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (patdog)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58938</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:11:36 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58935/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58935</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ and espn big ten heavy so i allways wonder about their promotion of leagues.  I would like to know who from the big 12 wants to mess with UGA, UF, LSU, or AU. 
We could do a sec v. big 12 challenge and they could conceivably lose all 12 games. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (rebelrouseri)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58935</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:06:52 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58933/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58933</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ (along with the late night Pac10 games), or does it just seem like it since I get about a dozen FoxSportsNet channels?
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (jakldawg)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58933</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:04:09 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58922/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58922</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m just a little sad because I think Missouri sucks and I don&#39;t think anyone is going to find out this year because of the schedule. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Henry Kissinger)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58922</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:30:00 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/reply/58918/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html#reply-58918</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ and i think 4 in the top 10 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Roy Munson)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/sreply/58918</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:24:39 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ FoxSports ranks Big12 ahead of SEC  ]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/topic/8147/t/FoxSports-ranks-Big12-ahead-of-SEC.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ While I believe there is enough quality teams to make it a debate- I just don&#39;t see it, however-
<br>
<br>
&quot;Calling roll, we find that Chase Daniel (Missouri), Sam Bradford (Oklahoma), Todd Reesing (Kansas), Colt McCoy (Texas) and Graham Harrell (Texas Tech)
are among the top pitch men in the nation.&quot;
<br>
<br>
Not bad.
<br>
<br>
Oklahoma, Kansas, Kansas State, Texas, Texas A&amp;M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, Nebraska, Iowa State, Baylor, Missouri and Colorado- Not a whole lot of
cupcakes in there.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/pgStory?contentId=8451592#sport=COLLEGE%20FOOTBALL&amp;photo=8450930">Link</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Hector)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.sixpackspeak.com/topic/8147</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:10:34 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>