| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
dawgstudent |
Everyone could hear them if they were moved there... | #1 | ||
|
I never understood why we didn't do this once there was "permanent" seating in the endzone.
I support the two most frustrating teams in America: The New Orleans Saints and the Mississippi State Bulldogs.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Todd4State |
It might be | #2 | ||
dawgstudent wrote: because the bleachers aren't high enough. Or that's probably the excuse that they would give you if you asked. Nevermind that the bands seating could be re-arranged. Also, believe it or not, supposedly there are SEC rules on how close the band can be to the field, and believe it or not, our band is supposedly too close to the field as it is, but it's overlooked because of our stadium design. Once again, nevermind that the band's seating arrangement could be re-arranged. |
||||
|
|
||||
bulldogbaja |
I think it's acoustics | #3 | ||
|
Now bear with me... The concrete actually does a lot to project the sound. Where the band is at in the stadium actually makes a big difference. For example,
Alabama's band is stuck back in a corner of their stadium, with an overhang above them, so it basically works like a megaphone, and they sound really loud.
If you hear them during their halftime show it's not nearly as loud.
Maybe they won't put the band there because then all the sound would scatter and you wouldn't be able to hear them. So I guess the solution is bowl the endzone. |
||||
|
|
||||
Todd4State |
You're right about the concrete | #4 | ||
|
but when a band is on the field and they are spread out over a wider area, they are not going to be as loud as they are when they are all bunched together.
|
||||
|
|
||||
8Dog |
Has anyone ever noticed that when... | #5 | ||
|
ole miss plays in vegas, they put their band in the west side upper deck and it sounds just like they are playing somewhere on the East side. I guess its the
way the sound bounces off...its the strangest thing.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Replies
| The best thing about the new video board, etc... | 07/03/08 08:55 AM | dawgstudent |
| Sound should be great... | 07/03/08 09:06 AM | Roy Munson |
| they may be loud.............. | 07/03/08 09:11 AM | futaba |
| As Jerry Garcia said | 07/03/08 09:34 AM | dawgoneyall |
| Re: The best thing about the new video board, etc... | 07/03/08 09:11 AM | KurtRambis4 |
| Everyone could hear them if they were moved there... | 07/03/08 09:28 AM | dawgstudent |
| It might be | 07/03/08 11:26 AM | Todd4State |
| I think it's acoustics | 07/03/08 11:33 AM | bulldogbaja |
| You're right about the concrete | 07/03/08 11:42 AM | Todd4State |
| Has anyone ever noticed that when... | 07/03/08 12:18 PM | 8Dog |
| So will the old jumbotron remain in service? | 07/03/08 09:13 AM | stevo1a |
| Re: The best thing about the new video board, etc... | 07/03/08 09:35 AM | vocaldawg7 |
| It's great to get a new sound system. The question I've..... | 07/03/08 11:30 AM | PanolaDog |





