Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Since the definition of RICO relates to a pattern of predicated offenses

    Couldn’t someone actually file charges against The Ref Crew, claiming The RICO Act as precedent? The multiple actions certainly give appearance of a Fraudulant Act, and the Powers behind the Refs acts, the SEC office, could then be charged with racketeering influences with the intent to control an outcome for the purposes of Financial Gain.


    Bowl Prep | Bowl Game Yes | No

  2. #2
    Good luck with that


    Bowl Prep | Bowl Game Yes | No

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by bruiser View Post
    Couldn’t someone actually file charges against The Ref Crew, claiming The RICO Act as precedent? The multiple actions certainly give appearance of a Fraudulant Act, and the Powers behind the Refs acts, the SEC office, could then be charged with racketeering influences with the intent to control an outcome for the purposes of Financial Gain.
    We would all be better off if you would devote your entire attention to advancing that “theory”.


    1 out of 1 sixpackers like this post
    Bowl Prep | Bowl Game Yes | No

  4. #4
    I’m sure dozens of Auburn fans have already had this conversation with their lawyer.


    Bowl Prep | Bowl Game Yes | No

  5. #5
    HotMop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Panama City Beach, FL
    Posts
    1,997
    RICO?

    Name:  Uncle_Rico.jpg
Views: 308
Size:  8.1 KB


    Bowl Prep | Bowl Game Yes | No

  6. #6
    We’d be counter-sued for impersonating an offensive genius.
    “I’m not going to take anything off the table at this point in time ... but I will tell you this,” Cohen began, “this person is going to have serious baseball experience as a head coach. This person is going to have made trips to Omaha, Nebraska. This person is going to have expertise in an area of the game and in all facets of the game. And this person is going to make our fan base very happy.” - Intense Bastard, April 5, 2018.


    1 out of 2 sixpackers like this post
    Bowl Prep | Bowl Game Yes | No

  7. #7
    Not sue. File charges for The Refs committing Fraudulent acts for “financial gain” via The SEC to gain advantages by getting more teams in the Top Bowl games.

    “I know it is not going to happen and even it did it would be thrown out.”

    But the Entire Football Nation is against Alabama, so loading up the possibility that they are a part of a Racketeering Crime group that goes as deep as the SEC officials and the SEC Commissioner’s office would certainly bring a Pall over their program.


    Bowl Prep | Bowl Game Yes | No

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SixPack Sponsors







Disclaimer: Neither this message board nor its rules and regulations are associated with Mississippi State University or any other Mississippi State sports website. Neither this message board nor its rules and regulations are associated with Scottish & Newcastle PLC d/b/a Bulldog Strong Ale. The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by SixPackSpeak.com. The interactive nature of the SixPackSpeak.com Discussion Forums makes it impossible for SixPackSpeak.com to assume responsibility for any of the content, including photographs and/or images, posted by participants. The ideas, suggestions, thoughts, recommendations, opinions, comments, advice, and observations made by participants of the interactive Discussion Forums are not endorsed by SixPackSpeak.com.


Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties