Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    dawgnabit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,521

    Gambling thread for 9/19

    Looking over the games for tomorrow, I have UL -2.5 over Miami.

    Also, why is Southern Miss favored by 5.5 over La Tech? Is LA Tech that bad?


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by dawgnabit View Post
    Looking over the games for tomorrow, I have UL -2.5 over Miami.

    Also, why is Southern Miss favored by 5.5 over La Tech? Is LA Tech that bad?
    LA Tech is supposed to be in a rebuilding year and they have also had some major COVID issues after the hurricane a couple of weeks ago. I'm honestly a little surprised this game didn't get cancelled. Certainly good news that it will still be played, but the point remains. I honestly wouldn't touch that line, who the heck knows how motivated USM is going to be the rest of this season after their coach is gone after one game. Could see them winning by 20 or losing outright.

    I like USF +26 against Notre Dame. That just seems like a high line based on what I saw from Notre Dame last week. I realize USF was bad last year but they should be a little better with a new coach and could lose this game 31-7 and still cover.


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  3. #3
    I like tulane -7, troy -3, WF on the moneyline, and LT +5.5. I dont understand the la tech line but damn USM looked bad against South.


    1 out of 1 sixpackers like this post
    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  4. #4
    This slate stinks for the record.

    I think GT can slow down UCF some today. Iíll take the under there. Also, could ULL give up a backdoor cover on the road? I could see that.

    Tulane had been a trend pick all week. That line has moved down over a point. Iíll probably take them as well.


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  5. #5
    Tulane didnít cover after leading by 24 at half. Thatís a kick in the balls.


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  6. #6
    I think The Citadel covers based on the 50+ point line at Bovada.


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Jddrew1142 View Post
    I like tulane -7, troy -3, WF on the moneyline, and LT +5.5. I dont understand the la tech line but damn USM looked bad against South.
    La Tech has a lot out with COVID


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  8. #8
    Told y'all Citadel would cover the spread.


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  9. #9
    dawgnabit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,521
    Quote Originally Posted by Mobile Bay View Post
    Told y'all Citadel would cover the spread.
    Iím never betting Clemson in those games. 49-0 at half and milk it to not score again. I took Clemson last week and it shouldíve been an easy cover and they did the same thing


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by 57stratdawg View Post
    Tulane didnít cover after leading by 24 at half. Thatís a kick in the balls.
    Yea that hurt badly.


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  11. #11
    dawgnabit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,521
    LA tech +5.5 and ML..... never in doubt. Lol


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

  12. #12
    Days like yesterday, I'm more than happy going 2-2. Really coulda been ugly. Some awful football being played, but i still love it.


    MS HIGHWAY PATROL | PETA Yes | No

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SixPack Sponsors








Disclaimer: Neither this message board nor its rules and regulations are associated with Mississippi State University or any other Mississippi State sports website. Neither this message board nor its rules and regulations are associated with Scottish & Newcastle PLC d/b/a Bulldog Strong Ale. The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by SixPackSpeak.com. The interactive nature of the SixPackSpeak.com Discussion Forums makes it impossible for SixPackSpeak.com to assume responsibility for any of the content, including photographs and/or images, posted by participants. The ideas, suggestions, thoughts, recommendations, opinions, comments, advice, and observations made by participants of the interactive Discussion Forums are not endorsed by SixPackSpeak.com.